So first I'll post this SSB addressing the different test results on his speed on the Avengers forum
I've opened this account to answer all the questions about the quality of our products once for all.
As you know we synthesize the amphetamine ourselves and we've been offering the same pure product since SR1 and I can guarantee you that the quality has only gone up. So where's the issue? It's the same sloppy lab routine of the Energy Control lab we've been suffering through the years.
Around 6 years ago when we started in this business we were sending samples regularly just to see how good was our product and how to improve it. After some time we realized that there was something odd with the results so we decided to send two samples of the same product and the results were embarrassing (for EC). One of the samples tested at around 50 and the second at more than 70%. This was the moment when we decided to stop working with EC and invest in our own chromatography kit.
The next issue we had was when a good customer of us opened a thread on the Silk Road 2 forums where he stated that our amphetamine was adulterated with caffeine, he wrote this in capital letters. Imagine how awful was this as we always struggled to offer the best quality product to everyone and suddenly we received this kick in the ass. Cutting amphetamine with caffeine is the dirtiest thing you can do, I was so angry that I directly attacked this poor guy calling him a bullshitter. After some discussion he told us that the sample was analyzed in Energy Control, I explained the problem we always had with EC and he agreed to send them an e-mail. EC repeated the analysis and concluded that there was no caffeine in the sample (surprise...) and the bad results came from a cross-contamination from a previous sample. So sloppy. (You can find the post in the SilkRoad2 forums mirror if you wish)
And now, you've send 3 samples from the same batch, because we've been selling the same batch from 2015 to March 2016, and they have tested at 57%, 51% and 67% which is just plain ridiculous.
I've also seen that there were odd results with some meth samples, so it's not only with amphetamine.
Operating a GC-MS can prove to be a difficult thing and if you have low resources it can be even more difficult, so I understand the issues that EC may have. We don't have such equipment, our test methods are less trendy but much more reliable and easy to use. And as I told you in the beginning we synthesize the product ourselves and we've been doing it for a long time so we know exactly if it's diluted or not and I can guarantee you that a 50 or 60% figure is way off, just impossible. I can't tell you an exact figure because I really don't know, but I'm sure that no batch has gone below 95%.
You can believe me or not, I will understand if you don't. But I wanted to tell you the real story. We'll continue to offer the best quality amphetamine of the darknet like we've been doing for the past 5 years.
Greetings! SuperSpeedBros
Now this alone wouldn't be much to go on. But then what about all the meth results they've already admitted were wrong? That didnt sound right they had kept samples and were going to do it again. The amount you send in is only enough for 1 sample in the first place. That too raises serious doubts in my mind.
UK vendor Meerkovo had 3 different test results from them off the same brick of batch MK04. Ordinarily I would say possible. But one result of 78%, one result of 93%? Dutch_Coke_Reviewer's test carried out in the Netherlands found it to be 83%, which converted to EC's GC/MS method would make for 94%. I'm pretty sure MK04 was sent in twice because people didn't believe the first result.
There's been quite alot of other results I dont quite believe either. My buddy ordered meth. Stuff he said was shit tested at 95%. Stuff he said was much better at 46%. He knows his shit.
Do you guys really put that much faith in it? I dont anymore but I think the only way forwards is to have 2 seperate labs confirm each batch, or maybe 3. If not we are relying too much upon one service getting everything 100% right for us. We are not holding or own DN testing service to accountability on it's credibility of the results we agree on. Where as if we could get another lab or 2 (I know BIG ask!!) also testing, we could be more sure of what we are saying as a community is how pure.
Just some food for thought.
As a spaniard who have had the "pleasure" of meeting some of the people involved in EC i wouldn't trust 100% their % of purity nor their biochemistry knowledge. You should ask them their opinion about homeopathy and have fun