If you had the choice.

Lets say you have a source of unlimited supply of drugs. The kind of drugs which always will provide profits and sell without too much hassle. Would you rather:

  1. Sell as much and as fast as possible and bail out after a few months.

  2. Minimize the risk, add it as a long term income and vend as little as possible while still making a very considerable amount of money month after month for years.


Comments


[29 Points] vistopher:

1.

Selling small amounts is a lot of work. Do you want to be a full time drug dealer? Not me


[11 Points] CookyDough:

  1. Sell as much and as fast as possible and bail out after a few months.

  2. Minimize the risk, add it as a long term income and vend as little as possible while still making a very considerable amount of money month after month for years.

or 3. become a bulk distributor only. Start small, but raise your minimums after you get decent customer base making decent size orders. Get resellers (offer support and guidance). Go private.


[3 Points] Dontcarepayme:

Why not both if you're smart about it?


[5 Points] Wingman4l7:

I feel like this an illegal version of the question "if you won the lottery, would you take the gradual payouts or the lump sum?" Similar mentality applies.


[2 Points] liberationjunkie:

I guess it really depends on how much of a risk I feel there is and how much money we are talking about. There always seems to be a balancing act between the two. But, most likely I would go with #2.


[2 Points] budsmokersonly710:

I would setup shop on a DNM and wouldn't sell to a soul IRL

Nobody lasts forever - you need to set a goal and retire once you get there. You never know when the next market will collapse for whatever reason not to mention the volatility of BTC


[2 Points] None:

sell as much and as fast as possible month after month for years, b. we stay hustlin


[2 Points] Mentalpopcorn:

Police need time to investigate and build a case against you, and the longer you sell, the better that case is going to be—it's just a matter of odds. Eventually most, if not all, get caught, so I'd go with #1, after which I would invest my money smartly. Make enough quick enough, get out, invest it the right way, and you can live off the interest.


[2 Points] stickykitty1:

I think a lot depends on your personality. I'm going with #2 right now myself and putting my nose to the grindstone. Have done #1 in the past and it can work too, faster but higher risk and more stress, and less total profits. Are you the type of person that likes to jump right in, get that hustle and flow going and make soemthing happen? Or are you someone that likes to be patient and safe and win the race in the long run?


[1 Points] -gimmebrains-:

Dos.


[1 Points] None:

Uno.


[1 Points] None:

Slow and steady wins the race 🐢


[1 Points] TripAddict:

[deleted]


[1 Points] None:

  1. build an empire i put 3 but it switched to 1


[1 Points] maxturbator:

The way it is phrased there is no logical reason not to go with 1.


[1 Points] box672:

I'd just do the drugs myself


[1 Points] entactoBob:

Given the options, get in & get out quickly. Everyone who gets out sets a goal, hits it, & stops dealing. They are a rare breed.

It's also wise to consider the U.S.S.G. & threshold drug amounts that trigger mandatory minimum sentences and/or carry inordinate amounts of time. Furthermore, these guidelines mandate how much time one gets for drug trafficking offenses. Whenever analyzing risk vs reward, always take the risk fully into consideration.

Case in point: meth. Just five grams of meth is all it takes to trigger a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence. (Five years if you have no priors, no violence, and no guns).

The answer is probably in between the two. Don't "possess" so much weight at once that a PWID (intent) would put you away for any more than a year or two, tops. But deal enough to make it worth your while, & for chrissakes, outside of acts of civil disobedience, don't commit felonies for free…


[1 Points] Vendor_BBMC:

The vendor doesn't have any choice. it depends if he has a sustainable source of drugs. 1. is a scammer, 2. is a vendor


[0 Points] DarkKnight_1111:

If you had an unlimited supply of drugs then you could do a couple HUGE deals Why wouldnt you just do number 1 then live off the proceeds and never have to worry about selling drugs or getting caught again?


[0 Points] None:

Use your own brain numbnutts. A lot goes into being a vendor and it has nothing to do with getting rich.