[Complaint/Warning] Stop spreading misinformation. Whether you sign for a package or not really does not matter in this day and age, especially in the US.

I have been reading so many comments saying, "don't sign for it" or "just no matter what you do, don't sign for it". I am tired of reading this, and I believe some of this is coming from people's fascination with crime shows. A signature is not going to inherently condemn you. More often than not, it's your record as far as the system is concerned. It will also be based on an intensive investigation. Also, if they catch small amounts it's simply easier to throw it away than go through a legal battle for $100 worth of drugs.

Lots of international mail service providers require a signature for tracked packages.

Spreading this in comments creates a false sense of security and therefore weakens security. Always have a fire under your ass as far as security goes.


Comments


[7 Points] Theeconomist1:

I think it's bc people wish a loophole existed that could guarantee to keep them outta trouble. Signing won't convict you nor will not signing guarantee you get a free pass.


[3 Points] JustAJunkie:

Yeah I don't see how signing for a package can prove guilt...

Assume we're NOT talking about darknet orders for this:

If the mail is delivered and you're asked to sign for something even if you're not expecting anything I'd bet that nearly everyone would agree to sign for it. Are you really going to think 'hmmm..l'm not expecting anything important.... must be drugs, I better not sign for it"? No, I doubt it. You're more likely to sign for it thinking you have purchased something but forgotten about it, or simply just to find out what's in it.

The point is, the majority of people are going to sign for something simply to see what it is. If a key piece of evidence in a case against you was the fact you 'knowingly' signed for a package I'm quite sure most lawyers could easily defend this as there's no real way to prove you did know what you were signing for. It may not be this simple for bulk buyers, but it still should not prove guilt.

Not signing for a package though would be more of a red flag IMO - How often is a person going to say no to signing for something they've received in the mail? Not often... probably the only people that would do so are those who know what's in the package and believe signing for it is going to land them in jail.

I've signed for clearnet RC orders and not even thought twice about it. It's not something I have to worry about though - if I was asked to sign for a package I'd know something was up, only because of the postage option I choose.

I don't see signing being able to prove guilt, though I do think it's a tactic used by LE to gather evidence to confirm suspicions and may be used to build weight on a case - but that's all it is, weight. It really doesn't prove anything and is mostly a useless piece of information, time and money.


[1 Points] None:

agreed. signed for all my shit. lol.


[1 Points] rbryanm:

deleted...never intended comments displayed in public searches like google, etc