Im not super familar with the US leagal system but im guessing that Ross will be appealing the decision. Could this theory be possible... As stated by numerous articles in the last few weeks its strange that the defense didn't go harder for the forth amendment by claiming he owned the servers. Now that he has been proven guilty in the appeal process could they use that ruling as proof that he did own the servers and his privacy was violated?
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy.
If you would like to do the same, add the browser extension GreaseMonkey to Firefox and add this open source script.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.