Would anybody being interested in a guide about flawless OPSEC mistakes about vendors and big players and other interesting things?

I would like to know if anybody here would be interested in some guides, I like to write and gathered a lot of data about arrests, OPSEC mistakes and even talk to talk to fraudsters, drug dealers (local and international) and other black hat addepts with many great tips and ways to maximize your potential or even avoid to being frauded/scammed/robbed or become a target for criminals/even LE on real life.

Also, it show OPSEC procedures, tips and hints too.


Comments


[59 Points] None:

yes, bring it on! could most definitely be beneficial


[29 Points] _PrinterPam_:

Flawless mistakes? ;)

Here's some personal advice on guides: You mentioned things like avoiding being frauded/scammed/robbed in addition to vending/big-boy OPSEC. These are disparate topics and you're likely to end up with the guide equivalent of 'feature creep' (as it relates to coding). If you intend to write a thorough guide, the complexity of these topics will increase the length of the guide exponentially. Limit your scope. And limit your scope even further than 'OPSEC' for vendors/big-buyers. They have some similarities, but far too many differences. If your guides are too large, which they will be if you properly cover the necessary complexities, you'll hit the "Ugh. TL;DR" factor.

In summary: Whittle-down to a very specific topic (save the rest for other guides). Outline it. Ensure the outline makes sense and follows a logical progression (i.e., doesn't stray from the 'specific' overall topic).


[9 Points] AdonisCreed33:

Do it, I'll donate to the cause. Help make the DNM's great again!


[7 Points] Cashcroppers:

Yes. I think everyone here would enjoy this.

Do you have any written yet?


[7 Points] None:

[deleted]


[4 Points] Confusedtrainofhate:

/r/darknetmarketsnoobs


[4 Points] sharpshooter789:

Nice try fed. Looks like your trying to get peoples contact info. Why not just post the guide here?


[3 Points] None:

[deleted]


[2 Points] Skipermix:

Everyone would love to see something like that. Let me know if you need any help. I might have some answers.


[2 Points] deeperbroken:

/r/TitleGore


[1 Points] SukkDissDick:

It would be excellent to add to the dnm guides on here too.

But flawless opsec? That's big words to be throwing out there.


[1 Points] None:

......and other interesting things


[1 Points] TheKeyOfKet:

yes yes


[1 Points] weeeeee6:

Yes and thank you


[1 Points] gregsterb:

Can you post some stuff to Pastebin?!?!


[1 Points] ShavingRaisins53:

Roosh V forums? Backtracing? Flawless OPSEC mistakes? If your serious, just publish. Even at that, this isn't the place. The rest of you just have been warned, you don't need to be learning flawless OPSEC mistakes...


[1 Points] None:

Sure, lets see it then man.


[1 Points] None:

[deleted]


[1 Points] psychejohndoe:

Will this guide include how to use multisig?


[1 Points] Tokamorus:

I would be interested in interesting things.


[1 Points] XanaxBoss:

Most vendors have shitty OPSEC when its about real life issues.


[1 Points] 2happytimes2:

youtube, packetstormsecurity, and deepdotweb have all that info for free.


[1 Points] exmachinalibertas:

Sure, I always like to know what other people think good security looks like...


[1 Points] JeffTutorialsYT:

Yeah, wouldn't hurt tbh


[1 Points] MT_Merchant_Mangler:

I believe this guide already exists. It was written by nachash.


[1 Points] NotMyWeight:

RemindMe! 1 month


[1 Points] scallet95:

RemindMe! 1 week


[1 Points] raincolors:

I think that's something a lot of people could use


[1 Points] crustedchlorides:

Yes, I would definitely be interested! I believe there was a lecture about this or something similar on defcon, correct me if I'm mistaken.


[1 Points] CollegeCoug69:

Yes please!!!! 1 opsec guide to rule them all


[1 Points] brasiliancardking:

Sorry, was AFK, now I'm back.


[1 Points] NotMyWeight:

Welllll...?