What's less risky? Buying edibles or LSD?

I feel like this may be counterintuitive. I would suspect that buying edibles would be the least risky, since they would have to get a search warrant to open the package, and then test them to see if they contain marijuana. LSD is probably harder to catch since it's just small bits of paper, but people still get caught for it. I'm not sure if anyone's ever been caught for edibles.


Comments


[4 Points] The_Dark_Nark_Marc:

Wait what?

I would suspect that buying edibles would be the least risky, since they would have to get a search warrant to open the package, and then test them to see if they contain marijuana.

But they would have to get a search warrant to open mail if they suspected LSD for whatever reason, and then they would test the tabs to see if it is LSD. I don't see how this makes edibles more stealthy. Edibles consume more space and do produce smell compared to LSD, a tiny ass piece of paper.


[3 Points] Rolling_Stonedd:

People have been caught with edibles. It can still smell like weed. Lsd is much less risky. It's paper lol


[2 Points] NASBNJ1992:

LSD is much safer


[1 Points] None:

I found this here

What products are most likely to get seized? The answer you all want to hear is cannabis. Yet it's not that simple. Most cannabis vendors double or triple vacuum pack the goods, which eliminates all odors. There are 3 things that lead to a package getting seized: Vendor profiling Bad stealth Bad/destroyed packaging. If the vendor has good stealth, and good packaging, the product should not matter. It all matters how it's packed, not what the contents are.


[1 Points] druggieslut:

How about not?