[EVO] mod. ScoobyJew changed my negative feedback by request from the vendor.

Long story short. Ordered a fake DL from Mike. Ships from Thailand to Scandinavia. Product never showed and Mike "lost" the tracking. Placed a new order (half price). This time tracking was provided, but product is seized. I don't want to go into details, but i know enough about the system to know whats going on. (post office wants my full name, address and phone number prior to me picking anything up) I relished escrow for both products, giving on positive and one negative feedback. Mike write ScoobyJew and asks him to remove the negative on. And ScoobyJew dos.

Do you think this is fair?


Comments


[6 Points] dell_arness2:

Dude that sucks. Mods should never change anyone's feedback ever unless they are padding.


[4 Points] None:

I'd just like to clarify something as there seems to be quite a bit of confusion about feedback disputes. If a vendor believes feedback left is inappropriate or unfair, they are welcome to dispute it by contacting staff (usually via support ticket). If the staff member agrees, s/he has the right to redact it, possibly change it from negative to neutral, etc. as s/he sees fit. This is most frequently seen in action when buyers (usually with little to no reputation) try to blackmail vendors with negative feedback. I just want to make clear that this is a dispute and it is not as simple for the vendor as asking us to remove it, and we do. We take both sides into consideration and ultimately use our professional discretion. If a vendor is being a little bitch and wants random feedback removed, I have no problem telling them I won't do it because I believe the feedback is fair and should be left up.

Being asked that of the post office is honestly not strange at all in my opinion, especially depending on the type of postal delivery used (this seems to be express international mail from Asia, and phone numbers are often required as seen in mail from China, etc.). I'm not going to try and question your judgement, and I respect your paranoia and your right not to pick up the package, but while it looks a bit weird, I wouldn't draw the conclusion that the package was seized (technically, not even seized, but just caught).

ScoobyJew explained very clearly why the feedback was removed. The vendor was more than cooperative throughout, and the fact that you were not willing to go pick up your own order does not give you an accurate experience with the vendor, nor does it justify negative feedback. Why should the vendor, after helping you resolve the issue with your order, suffer a hit on his reputation beause you, quite frankly, didn't feel like picking it up?


[1 Points] CocaineNose:

<n/a>


[1 Points] twigburst:

So he did a reship for half off and it got seized twice because of customs? What the fuck do you expect him to do? Why are you entitled to another reship?


[0 Points] Chilupabatman:

Iv been in dispute with a vendor for 25 days now :( lol and a sniperfox has still yet to come to any short of conclusion so I'm not all that surprised to say the least.


[0 Points] Diamonddweller:

What a lame ass move. I get bad feedback once in awhile, just have to suck it up. But for Evolution to remove a bad review for a vendor is not cool. I thought Evolution was a trustworthy site. I guess not!


[0 Points] scoobydumb69:

Just to be clear, The vendor is no scammer, but managed to fuck up just about everything from encryption, pictures and tracking to the lack of stealth.


[-1 Points] VendMolly:

Evo...run by TCF (carding form) in which was busted and taken over by LE which may still be the case. MODS of Evo are the same. I dont trust them and thanks for this post. It helps me now know how the mods are being suspicious. Sorry to hear this


[-2 Points] VendMolly:

This post also seems to make us undertnd that EVO may be more of a honeypot that previously thought..comments?


[-7 Points] None:

evo is le hney pot