Say some Hick in Kentucky went onto DNM and bought BTC with shit OPSEC, but simply had the goods arrive to a drop 10 minutes from the Hick.
Now if the Hick got the pack sent to his address with his name and it got intercepted, then you would assume at first the LE would focus on the address it was sent to, right? Then since the Hick didn't hide his traces the evidence would be on his computer when investigated and boom.
BUT, WHAT ABOUT THIS CIRCUMSTANCE.....
What if the Hick got the goods sent to a drop house with a different name, then the package got intercepted? LE wouldn't even have a single lead being that the receiver name/address on the package was sent to Tammy ButterBall instead of the Hicks address, so the Hick wouldn't be anywhere on LE's radar.
Am I wrong?
Yes, because there is no reason to be that sloppy. The cops are going to nab someone getting that pack and if not hick himself you better believe whoever gets nabbed rolls over on hick first thing.