Rule 12 question

Hey underground creatures .
What if i received a package with a stealth so terrible it could be an opsec risk ?
Should I do a review without detailing it just give a 0/5 ?
This is so terrible I'm still wondering how the fuck it could have landed .


Comments


[30 Points] None:

Absolutely before someone goes to jail.


[19 Points] throwknifeyspoon:

You don't go into details of stealth. That's ways shit is hidden. If it's a very obvious lump in an envelope that isn't properly sealed then that isn't stealth at all, is it?

Give all details, name and shame


[15 Points] Funkiter69:

I've messaged the vendor .
No vac , no mylar .
It was a solid object in a simple letter .
Potato edit : https://imgur.com/wNlOdIM

Edit2 : and I forgot , was send from FUCKING Nederland ...

Edit : was MDMA don't bother with the 2cb story I got red bunny since then o/


[13 Points] None:

[deleted]


[1 Points] None:

Yeah man do it


[1 Points] snailbully:

Name and shame


[1 Points] drkntmrkets:

Rule 12 is dumb.


[-1 Points] Vendor_BBMC:

Well, it DID make it. You're paying for drugs, not a "stealth".

If you were, you would give the stealth a 0/5 no doubt. But you need to have a good reason to ruin a vendor's market rating, adequate stealth isn't one of them. Mention it in the feedback about the drug but give a 5/5.