Hey I have been grabbing MDMA, Shrooms and acid off of a vendor named Canada.. His shrooms and acid are amazing but im not so sure about the MDMA, It seems kind of methy but he says its pure all the time.. I told him it seemed a little methy and got this as a reply
"Saw your feedback and just wanted to let you know that I'm sending samples of all recent batches to EC soon for lab analysis just to have a point of reference for this producer which has been supplying me for over 6 months. In the past I've sourced from any one of multiple brokers who themselves patch things through from multiple producers (often the same ones) as the market here is fairly volatile and fast moving but this is the longest stretch I've been able to supply 100% from one single lab in years so I figure it's a good opportunity to get a bunch of different batches tested for purity. I will be amazed if there are any other psychoactives present and will be putting up results up on an AlphaBay listing in text and image form.
A note on Marquis: I've had slightly off/questionable looking results with Marquis in the past (that made me think maybe a little meth in mostly mdma) and sent to EcstasyData(dotORG) for lab testing just to be safe and every time it's come back as just MDMA. I have many mutual friends with this source and it's not their style to be disingenuous for profit, they're ethical and honest and do good work and their business is going well.
I encourage customers to send for lab analysis if they feel they want to too.
Ecstasydata is cheaper and faster with results (lately) but will not tell you purity (only presence of psychoactive compounds and ratios if more than one) because they're permitted by the DEA to operate for harm reduction purposes and they don't want people like me using them for quality control to make educated business decisions or for marketing.
Energy Control in Spain is a bit more expensive, sometimes takes a while to give results, but DOES tell you purity, and for a slightly higher price they also provide the spectrometer graph so that people who know their chemistry can evaluate the peaks too. Unfortunately the market moves waaay too fast for me to use such slow lab results to inform which product I buy as anything I have tested will be long gone by the time the results are in, so I rely on reagents and being extremely selective of my sources, and then base my picks on aesthetics (aesthetics LAST, reagents FIRST) - but like I said, one single producer is single handedly supplying me for the first time in a long time, so there's no better time than to get a thorough assessment of their recent work!
A note on MDMA stereo-isomers: If I recall correctly, there are two active isomers of MDMA (same molecular structure, but symmetrically mirrored like your left and right hand, you can't lay them both palm down facing the same direction without the thumbs and pinkies being on opposite sides) and one isomer is about one third as potent by weight as the other one and also more mellow and less stimulating. The other, in isolation, is much "speedier" but also packs a bit of a punch and in a typical combined ratio gives the expected potency by weight for experienced users who know what to usually expect. Almost NEVER will you come across MDMA that isn't an isomeric mixture of the two but different ways of synthesizing it will result in different ratios and for some people a somewhat noticeable spectrum of effects between different products produced differently. If I am not mistaken, there's a probability distribution that results in most synths producing a ratio of near 50/50 to maybe 60/40ish of 70/30 in either direction in extreme cases - this is what I vaguely recall from my research into the matter years ago, can't remember sources and am not 100% on their credibility, so take this with a grain of salt, not fact - I am no expert.
It is possible to isolate and separate the isomers which I would like to do at some point for the sake of experimentation, but I do not think they would be very marketable for profit. The mellower one would probably be the nicer high of the two but the potency by weight would be far lower than people expect based on their experience with a typical isomeric mix, and the more stimulating and stronger one could very well be undesirable for most people on it's own, and not marketable. If most people didn't like that one, and you are someone buying, not producing, or producing at a significant cost due to precursor scarcity or whatever, you would be making (in the case of product that's 50/50) half of your product worthless, and to make money on the other half alone have to charge twice as much for something that's far less potent by weight, which even if people really like it once they get to know it, may make for a difficult sell. I would still like to do this some day just so that people can experiment with both isomers in isolation, something very few have had the privilege of doing, but it may not be be rational from a business standpoint, or, for all I know, they would both have their place and it would actually appeal to people and work out in both regards.
My isomer ratio tangent is to explain why not all MDMA that tests as only MDMA gives the same high, and product from different batches/sources may have some variance.
Also, with ongoing repeated (and especially with frequent) use, the desirable effects of MDMA (ie. empathy/love, boundary dissolving goodness!) tend to fade relative to the physiological side effects and ability to feel "fucked up" - people who over-use can always increase their dose to feel fucked up, but with time, ongoing use makes the more wonderful effects fade with time. You can't keep getting the same degree of empathy and clarity/openness by upping the dose as those effects fade, but with enough, you will always be able to get fucked up. This is why I highly recommend very infrequent use and VERY LONG BREAKS for people who have ALREADY over-done it. The goodness fades far faster than it can be restored. Many people are aware of all this (so no disrespect with my rambling, I'm not assuming you do or don't know anything, just that you are experienced) but I believe that sometimes people notice the changes in the way they react to it and attribute it to the product that they are consuming and not the sometimes gradual long term changes within the brain from using, even though it can also actually be a difference with the product too.
I do not mean to assert that the isomer ratio is definitely the reason for your observation it's "speedy"-ness or claim to have any idea how probable it is that it's the user(s) and not the product. I do not know the isomer ratio of any batch I've ever sold or any batch you've ever done; I do not now the user(s) this assessment is coming from, or basis of the assessment, or the past experience or knowledge they hold, so it would be arrogant of me to have formed a concrete conclusion and think that I know. I'm just offering thoughts based and information based on my personal experience and reading. I also lack citations for my info on the characteristics of the isomers or the probability distribution of the ratios resulting from common synthesis methods and some of that information may be somewhat off, but that's what I remember.
Basically just rambling some food for thought, but I appreciate the feedback, especially coming from a longer term repeat customer such as yourself."
My friend just got a drug test and it says he has meth in him lmao, Does anyone have any results from canadas MDMA or is anyone willing to buy some and put it through a test?
His stuff is cheaper than most other peoples and thats why I have been buying it, But if its not good I will stop buying it.. Just wanna see if anyone knows anything about him or his MDMA
Holy fuck