vendore reviews vs. product reviews

so, i'm building up a little personal collection of lsd. i've got some from GammaGoblin, HoS, some asian crystal from Study_Buddy, and very shortly should have some from CanadaLabSupply and DHLab. Going to try to add some from TGUK and some JoR at some point in the near future as well.

between work and family obligations, it's going to take a while to sample all of these to give a valid product review, so is anyone interested in just vendor reviews? communications, speed, stealth, etc?

tl:dr - do you want reviews of a vendor without reviews of the product?


Comments


[8 Points] HonkySpaceship:

I want reviews of the whole experience. How good/bad is the product and how good/bad is the vendor.

The more objective facts you put in, like reagent results, lab results, weight, appearance, delivery times, basically any information you can put down that cannot be refuted, the better.

I don't want your interpretation of ANYTHING. I'll figure out what is what based on facts and evidence. Maybe your interpretation of the experience can offer insight, sweet, put that in the comments, otherwise if you want to get a point across, lead the reader their with evidence.

Trip reports are different as they should be recounts of your experience instead of the interpretation of the product's or service's effect(s) on you. These can be really helpful if kept somewhat objective. I like to think I've done my research and know what to expect from what I plan on buying. If you think you got to level 5 on a shroom trip from just a gram, don't tell me you got to level 5, tell me what you saw, felt, experienced and I'll say, "damn sounds like this nigga got to level 5 on just a gram based on my experiences with shrooms and what I've read." That has a much bigger effect on me than when you say you got to level 5 on a gram. Then I'm thinking, "this guy never got to level 5, he woulda written a book if he had, I wonder why he's being a shill."

Details and evidence are dope, thanks.


[2 Points] None:

In all honesty the only part people seem to care about with weed reviews is a photo.

Most heavy and moderate users can look at a good photo and roughly judge the category it falls into. And many product reviews do not put enough details on which 'weed category' it is or compare with anything. So the photo is actually more useful to me than the opinion anyway!

Be sure to anonymize any photos you take by stripping out the exif / gps data.


[1 Points] DNMtor1:

I have the same issue with weed - lots of products to review but want to give them all a proper trial before posting. I considered doing "Vendor (P)Reviews" posting the transaction details and a picture or two.

I think any feedback is worthwhile so my vote would bef or you to do it.


[1 Points] CynicalElephant:

I'm worried about you building up a tolerance to LSD, so the more you review, the worse the products become. Also, you need to add BlueViking to your collection.