When the first lab test of a BV tab showed a lower dose than advertised, I had just tripped on one BV tab a few weeks before. To satisfy my own curiosity, I sent a tab from the same order in to Energy Control.
Product: 10 x 200 ug Pacman print, ordered second week of February 2015.
Picture: http://anony.ws/image/DUQo
Results:
Sample Code: BV200 | Substance: LSD | Lab Code: 1237 | Result: LSd 182 ug
Our results offer directly the result of the salt as we're using a salt as reference standard. Attached you'll find the graph of the qualitative analysis performed with GC/MS. And the quantitative result, which was obtained from HPLC/MS/MS using a calibration curve from a reference standard.
GC/MS: http://anony.ws/image/DUQL
EDIT - a few days later, EC (unprompted) sent me a more detailed report. It seems to include a qualitative and quantitative graph, as well as a spreadsheet for calculations. At first glance, it appears this report contains enough information to manually verify the result, but I can't seem to get the math to work. Interestingly, this report says 186 ug, not 182 ug; perhaps they used an average of multiple runs?
I know these results are inconsistent with the others, and I have no ideas as to why. Hopefully the community finds this result helpful.
Who do we believe? fuck this shit man, I'm gonna fap to bailey jay