Maybe this topic's already been brought up but I can't find it searching and I'm just curious on your thoughts. From what I've read, it seems that just opening a package in a CD is enough to prove you had knowledge of what was inside and are thus guilty. This seems like bullshit.
If I'd gotten a package addressed to me before I knew anything about dark net markets and I didn't know what was inside my curiosity would have probably made me open it anyway. I suspect most people are still this way.
This leads me to my main question: If dealers were to occasionally just ship some small amount of drugs to various random (innocent and unknown) people, then wouldn't it (after enough clearly innocent people get shipped drugs and open them out of curiosity) erode the logic that anyone receiving and opening drugs is probably guilty?
Obviously it might take a while for this to sink in and the first innocent people to get shipped drugs would probably get fucked over. Fuck, maybe that's just too much of a shitty thing to do initially. After an ethically rocky start, though, wouldn't it help in the long run? Maybe there's something I'm missing but it seems like it would work as an excuse in a lot of these CD cases.
One problem I can think of is that the person doing this sending would take on a certain amount of risk and financial loss without much of any reward.
The risk for domestic orders resulting in your arrest is already pretty low. Especially if you aren't buying bulk or reselling locally. I don't understand the consistent paranoia.