Feedback Etiquette

I see a lot of lower feedback scores left for vendors that often looks a little too harsh/overexaggerated to justify IMO. Most recent one was for a 1000+ order vendor with around a 98% feedback score. A recent 4/5 left seemed a little picky when what was written was basically 'great shipping and stealth, but OZ weighed out to 27.96 on my scale, but its top quality bud -- ' and that's about where the feedback text cut off for non vendors (using Agora).

But it's acknowledged the shipping, stealth and quality were all up to par, but 00.04 grams off weight drops the rating down 20%? Even if it wan't attributed to HIS scale (which may have been off) and was legit that much short, seems way to minor to even care.

But it got me thinking, what is your 'Feedback Method' when rating a vendor? Do you have certain aspects that automatically bring the score down a notch? Like if Stealth and Shipping Speed was lacking, do you automatically go 3/5 as the best he could get?

I can't see the need for any 0/5 if you received your product, regardless of any other circumstances. That to me is reserved for a no show or scam to me, honestly I wish they'd replace 0/5 with No Show or something on Agora instead, with 1/5 being the lowest feedback allowed if you received your product.

What's your opinion?

But I guess it all depends on what


Comments


[3 Points] 24362312526223:

No order should ever weigh less than intended. And I'm glad he had the balls to leave 4/5. Unfortunately, I am too chicken-shit to leave negative feedback with a stranger/drug dealer who has my personal details. I wil, however, wait a random amount of time, come back to reddit and leave a SCATHING review of his shitty service.


[1 Points] None:

If I order a gram of cocaine and it arrives but tests show the substance has no cocaine but other dangerous chemicals, is a 0/5 not justified?