Okay so we all (should) know about plausible deniability and the whole act-as-if thing, but that just covers the core legal part of our endeavor -I mean, LE will know you knowingly ordered those drugs, they just won't be able to prove it.
So to further obfuscate things, consider this: a cute hippie website where people sign up and submit their address for other members to send them anything they want, like little gifts or souvenirs from their place and shit.
So you sign up, you submit your address and it's out there for anyone to send you stuff and other people's addresses are of course available to you if you wanna reciprocate.
So if and when LE asks you "who would have sent you this" you can be all like "well I signed up for this thing some time ago, maybe someone thought drugs make a good gift...?"
What do you guys think?
edit,
this is a c/p that helps clarify some things addressed to my suggestion:
I really did mean you can browse (or be presented with random) addresses once you've submitted your own. cause if LE were to signup to test it out, it would need to actually "work" as it's supposed to.
Some of you raised the issue of CREEPY STALKERS IN OUR FAIRYTALE WORLD, but many people pointed out the obvious: you can still browse anyone's page on fb or find any address just by using a phone book.
So, the whole idea of this thing is, again, to have an address that can already be found (in the phone book) ALSO present in a website that promotes postal correspondence. WITH STRANGERS. Which, ideally, does not require any sort of ID (so you can fill it with 999 fake addresses and 1 real) to FURTHER obfuscate LE by letting anyone post anyone's address and make it impossible to monitor every single one, even if we're talking just one country.
So not only you might really get an unexpected delivery which you TRUTHFULLY wouldn't know what it contains, but you don't even have to confess to know about that inherently innocent service that some freak abused to post drugs to a random stranger, because anyone could have signed you up for it.
To put matters simply, it makes the act-as-if rule a thousand times more plausible.
I can imagine me thinking of this high af