Satoshi Nakamoto exposed? I don't believe it.

http://mag.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto.html

Fuck newsweek if it's true, but I don't believe it for a second.

What do you guys think?


Comments


[8 Points] queryox1:

After reading this article the journalist should be pretty ashamed. If a man does not want to be found, how does tricking him into emailing him about personal subjects and pretending to be-friend him, only to turn around and expose every concise detail about his life, turn up at his house and harass his family members? 

Thats not journalism, thats being a fucking dick. He says many times he is shy and does not want to be exposed and you post pictures of his house and give his life in full. Shameful. Just because he refuses to talk about Bitcoin, does this mean it is him?

"A man who prides himself on anonymity" - uses real name? mhm


[3 Points] migrex10:

if it's true they have fucked up satoshi's life, his family is not going to be safe and i think there's a lot more history behind that guy, dark history... The point i don't understood iis if it has that much BTC and he and his family they are poor ¿?¿?


[3 Points] None:

[deleted]


[2 Points] StuffyKnows2Much:

His actual name is Satoshi Nakamoto? How likely does that seem?


[1 Points] koderr:

This is what gives journalists a bad name. They tricked Gavin Andresen into saying something he probably shouldn't have and twisted the rest.

Free summary here btw. http://www.theverge.com/2014/3/6/5477242/newsweek-claims-its-found-satoshi-nakamoto-man-behind-bitcoin


[1 Points] grumpydoge:

An update... looks like the real Satoshi has logged on for the first time in years claiming to not be Dorian Nakamoto.

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source?xg_source=activity&id=2003008%3ATopic%3A9402&page=2#comments