int'l tracking: an OPSEC risk or not?

Is it true that packages which have tracking info are more highly scrutinized by US customs? would it be in my best interests to not request tracking info on medium-large sized packs from DE?


Comments


[4 Points] hillarys_yoni:

Yes. And yes. Ordering priority will give you the benefit of knowing where your investment is at the cost of lowered OPSEC. It is just that simple. Period. Don't listen to any clowns trying to convince you otherwise.


[3 Points] None:

It's all those fucking sand niggers ruining everything for us. We should've just nuked the whole Middle East after 9/11 and sent the rest of them to the South Pole. The world would be a much better place today if we woulda done that especially for us drug dealers.


[1 Points] trappy_AB:

There is no proof of extra scrutiny on packs with tracking as opposed to those without tracking but that said international packs will always have more scrutiny than domestic packs, and packs with tracking will actually have a notice of "SEIZED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT" when they are SEIZED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT and packs without tracking will not have such information unless you telepathically check and even then that sounds very difficult.

My personal advice is to always order domestic and do not view your tracking period because not only does viewing tracking over TOR alert law enforcement of potential criminal activity, it also damages or destroys your plausible deniability although this is so far unproven as well.


[1 Points] BLACKBUSINES:

ANY priority pack, regardless of international shipping or not, will ultimately be less safe than standard mail. Standard mail goes through WAY less hands/checkpoints. It is during these more "personal" encounters that an employee is more likely to notice something "up" with the pack. Obviously there are no quantifiable statistics but it is just simply common sense that a priority pack will have more attention given to it.


[0 Points] sc0rt: