Is it ok that ALL my packs from a certain vendor have the same return address?

I buy monthly from a certain highly regarded vendor, and have noticed that for the past 3-4 months I've been getting packs with the same return name and address. Is this propper OPSEC? On a CD to a totally clean house, couldn't they use the fact that I've recieved packs from this person plenty of times in the past as evidence against me?

Also, is it bad that this vendor hasn't changed their wallet address in a few months at least? I DD and always deposit to the same address.

Thanks yall


Comments


[5 Points] None:

[deleted]


[5 Points] RosyPalm:

I buy monthly from a certain highly regarded vendor, and have noticed that for the past 3-4 months I've been getting packs with the same return name and address. Is this propper OPSEC?

No, the vendor is an idiot that thinks he'll never get caught.

On a CD....

They'll be too busy going over 4 months of Mail Cover data trying to locate the vendors operating area to worry too much about you. They'll probably cut you a deal to set him up when they think they know his usual drop offs, and this guy probably only uses one anyway.

Also, is it bad that this vendor hasn't changed their wallet address in a few months at least?

Just means LE has one nice fat transaction history to use if they catch him. Easy enough to change it regularly.


[1 Points] Pelican_Vendor:

Depends. Some can do what I do and use a certain return addy depending of the day of the week. Once a pack goes return to sender or something that causes a pack to get burned that return is never used. I have been more creative lately but you should just ask the vendor whats up maybe you keep getting the same one randomly?


[1 Points] CookyDough:

Sounds like your vendor is being a bit lazy.


[1 Points] None:

I remember themoneyteam777 used to do that shit. always the same return address.

but like pelican said, there are lots of ways you can re-use the same return address safely. in some ways can even be MORE safe than constantly switching them up. but it's more than just literally re-using the same address on every single pack, over and over and over again, which is what it sounds like he might be doing.