Silk Road forums
Support => Feature requests => Topic started by: RootZero on August 17, 2012, 04:34 pm
-
1. Bitcoin mixer / anonymity for incoming coins, this would solve a huge amount of anonymity problems getting cash -> SR.
2. Sorting and searching. Needs to be many more options for sorting listings, price being the most logical.
3. Ability to show listings in any currency updated as often as possible to the exchanges.
Those 3 are my highest priority changes I'd like to see.
4. Improvements to the feedback system. Move towards an ebay type system so you can review multiple aspects of service. E.g. Dispatch time, product quality, communication, value for money, etc. This would also work well with sorting listings.
5. Don't trash vendor feedback just by leaving less than 5/5. Perhaps a 10/10 vote and a sliding scale as to how this effects the vendors score. Would like to see buyers leaving maximum feedback only when they've received truly exceptional service.
-
1. SR already has a built-in tumbler.
-
1. SR already has a built-in tumbler.
Only for withdrawals as far as I know? Can you link to a anything that confirms this?
The 'How to use SR anon" thread specifically suggests using an anonymizing process between exchanges and SR.
-
1. Bitcoin mixer / anonymity for incoming coins, this would solve a huge amount of anonymity problems getting cash -> SR.
2. Sorting and searching. Needs to be many more options for sorting listings, price being the most logical.
3. Ability to show listings in any currency updated as often as possible to the exchanges.
Those 3 are my highest priority changes I'd like to see.
4. Improvements to the feedback system. Move towards an ebay type system so you can review multiple aspects of service. E.g. Dispatch time, product quality, communication, value for money, etc. This would also work well with sorting listings.
5. Don't trash vendor feedback just by leaving less than 5/5. Perhaps a 10/10 vote and a sliding scale as to how this effects the vendors score. Would like to see buyers leaving maximum feedback only when they've received truly exceptional service.
I agree with RootZero 100%, great ideas bro
-
1. Bitcoin mixer / anonymity for incoming coins, this would solve a huge amount of anonymity problems getting cash -> SR.
2. Sorting and searching. Needs to be many more options for sorting listings, price being the most logical.
3. Ability to show listings in any currency updated as often as possible to the exchanges.
Those 3 are my highest priority changes I'd like to see.
4. Improvements to the feedback system. Move towards an ebay type system so you can review multiple aspects of service. E.g. Dispatch time, product quality, communication, value for money, etc. This would also work well with sorting listings.
5. Don't trash vendor feedback just by leaving less than 5/5. Perhaps a 10/10 vote and a sliding scale as to how this effects the vendors score. Would like to see buyers leaving maximum feedback only when they've received truly exceptional service.
Good post, the currency converter and sorting and the option to sort listings by price, (high to low,low to high) would be seriously practical and helpfull!
-
Hi,
I like those ideas, though they might not be as simple to implement as some believe.
Take the sorting for example: In order to meaningfully sort by price, the vendor would have to set
a price for a standardized quantity, which probably differs between categories.
(i.e. to compare weed-prices you could take 1g as a "standard-quantity", which won't make much sense for,
say, LSD). Everything you want to search for, the vendors have to enter in some structured form, meaning
more work for the vendors and of course a lot of work on the server side, the DB-model has to be changed,
etc. .
But that might be a nice feature: Twice a year users can choose one of a number of proposed new features
that have been checked for feasibility by DPR, for example by paying a small amount (to reduce trolls etc.) .
So there would be a small incentive for DPR to do the changes (or have them done), the users (both vendors and
customers) have a little say in what is going on, all are happy ;)
-
Hi,
I like those ideas, though they might not be as simple to implement as some believe.
Take the sorting for example: In order to meaningfully sort by price, the vendor would have to set
a price for a standardized quantity, which probably differs between categories.
(i.e. to compare weed-prices you could take 1g as a "standard-quantity", which won't make much sense for,
say, LSD). Everything you want to search for, the vendors have to enter in some structured form, meaning
more work for the vendors and of course a lot of work on the server side, the DB-model has to be changed,
etc. .
I see that problem, implementing a unit price would be very difficult to do and confusing for vendors. But it would still help with just a simple list by price when looking for a good deal. It would probably encourage vendors to list by unit too, which is very helpful at times. It works like that on ebay and amazon so it would help here too.
-
yes, sure, I would absolutely love this feature, as a customer naturally, but also as a legit vendor I like to know the prices of my "competition".
I just wanted to explain that such features are most often more work than is generally anticipated.