Silk Road forums

Market => Rumor mill => Topic started by: strangelights on July 18, 2013, 01:37 am

Title: Lochstock review thread
Post by: strangelights on July 18, 2013, 01:37 am
I didn't see a review thread on here for Lochstock, so I thought I'd start one since I ordered from him/her recently.

Lochstock requires new buyers to FE, which I swore I'd never do.  However, I wanted ketamine, shipped from the US, at a good price, and I didn't want to keep checking back for new listings, so I read his feedback and decided to go for it.  I placed my order on Wednesday, it was marked "in transit" on Friday, I finalized immediately, and I received my order on Monday.

I weighed the ketamine and it was exactly 1g, as listed.  I did 50mg just to confirm that it is in fact k, and I had a nice mild trip.  Since I've only done k twice before, both in small amounts, I can't really comment on quality, but it definitely met my expectations.  I'm looking forward to trying it in a larger dose for the first time!

Overall, I'm happy with my order and would definitely order from this vendor again.
Title: Re: Lochstock review thread
Post by: atwas99 on August 25, 2013, 12:50 am
tl;dr ---> Lochstock 4/5

Overall, Lochstock seems to be a great vendor; however, the quality of the MDMA is not top notch.

GOOD
-Great customer service. All of my questions were answered quickly with detailed responses.
-Fast shipping. It took 3 to 4 days from the time I clicked order till the package arrived.
-Very reasonable MDMA prices.

QUESTIONABLE
-I was worried about the quality 5g of MDMA that I received from LS after I opened my package. Read more about this below.
-The shipping stealth was sub par. I messaged LS about this, and he says this will be fixed in the future.

I bought 5g of MDMA from Lochstock not too long ago. I picked Lockstock because raverlove was out of listings, and LS was offering MDMA at an unbeatable price.

MDMA QUALITY

As I said above, the MDMA I received didn't look like MDMA I've received before. It came in big chunks, which was good. But it broke down into a powder instead of crystals, was a dark tan color, and it smelled heavily of sassafras. At first I wondered if this was indeed real MDMA. I did three kinds of tests to determine if this was MDMA and the quality of it.

1) Marquis Test - The MDMA tested positive with the marquis test for MDxx. I test both the washed and unwashed mdma; both of them tested positive for MDxx.

2) Acetone Wash - I performed two different acetone washes. The first wash with 0.5g produces a loss of 40% of product.  Another acetone wash with 3.5g returned 80% of the product. The resulting powder is both cases was lighter in color. A lot closer to white. The loss of weight suggests, to me, that the MDMA was not 84% pure as advertised.
.
3) User Experiences - I was given experiences from both the prewashed and washed MDMA. 
    The prewashed MDMA caused a mild euphoria at 100mg. It also caused people to throw up and feel bad physically. Also, the comedown wasn't very pleasant.
    The washed mdma caused a strong euphoria. A couple people still threw up, but they said the experience was very positive. And the comedown was okay. Better than the unwashed mdma

All in all, people said the washed mdma was better than the mdma. The washed gave them a stronger euphoria and without as much of a body load.

I don't know if the MDMA was cut with something or if it just wasn't cleaned fully. Either way, the unwashed mdma (the MDMA I received in the package from LS) was not as good as it could be.

I had to spend extra money for a marquis test and time and money washing the MDMA.
All in all, ordering from Lochstock was a positive experience, but the MDMA, as sold to me, did not seem like it was 84% pure. But also bear in mind that this MDMA was some of cheapest offered at the time of ordering.
Title: Re: Lochstock review thread
Post by: xda on August 25, 2013, 04:10 am
That's really a shame, his batch before this one was the best mdma Iv ever had in my life

You can see it here http://i7.minus.com/ibiBvwQrCLGHIm.jpg

Blew my head off and iv been doing mdma for over 15 years,I know he lost some of his connects but Im hoping he will be getting the pmk again, I was unable to test his new tan batch but honestlyIim a mdma snob and only do pure clear/white crystals.
Title: Re: Lochstock review thread
Post by: convergedlight on August 25, 2013, 07:39 am
I also ordered some of lochstock's brown MDMA crystals recently.  I had used MDMA a few times in the past, but never had the pure crystals, so I can't comment on the quality of the crystals.  But, for what it's worth, mine didn't seem to break into a powder easily.  It arrived with a couple larger rocks and several smaller crystals maybe 2mm wide.  I presumed it may have been broken up like this to make it easier to mail discretely.  It did have a noticable odor but I'm not sure what sassafras smells like so I can't say if it smelled like that.  But, I tested it at a dose of 100mg, and it seemed about like what I expected.  I didn't notice anything particularly bad or unpleasant about it or a body load like you're describing.  As far as I know, the MDMA pills I've had before were in the 120-140mg range, and the 100mg of lochstock's stuff felt close to as strong as that.  So, I'd be surprised if the purity was very low even though it had a brown color.  I did see many different listings here for 84% MDMA crystals, and most of them seemed to have the same brown appearence, so it seems somewhat common level of quality/appearence.  Of course, the picture of white crystals immediately above looks much better, but maybe that is abnormally high quality.  I think even a small % of impurities could seriously change the color of something that is white or clear, so it's hard to speculate on the purity.  The amount of material you washed out of your sample though seems ridiculously high.  What I received had to be somewhat close to pure despite the color or I'd expect it to have felt a lot weaker for a 100mg dose.

EDIT: I went and looked again and what I had, and the smallest pieces it is broken down to is actually closer to a sand than the 2mm crystals I described.  It still looks crystalline to me, so I wouldn't go so far as to call it powder, but sand consistency is closer to the truth.  But, it still had the appearence to me that it is was just crushed bits of the same larger rock, not that it had been cut or anything.
Title: Re: Lochstock review thread
Post by: atwas99 on August 25, 2013, 08:58 pm
I agree. A sand texture is a much better description than powder.

And there were mixed user experiences. For some, the unwashed worked fine. But for some people the unwashed caused a negative experience, and for others there was a small high that did not match the dose.

So it's hard for me to come to a single conclusion about the quality.