Silk Road forums

Discussion => Philosophy, Economics and Justice => Topic started by: coglac on June 03, 2013, 04:01 pm

Title: Chipping away at the constitution
Post by: coglac on June 03, 2013, 04:01 pm

The GuardianSectionsTop stories
Technology
 Saturday 1 June 2013 16.49 BST
Google ordered to hand private customer data over to FBI investigators
Judge who earlier ruled National Security Letters unconstitutional orders Google to nonetheless comply with them

 It was unclear from the judge's ruling what type of information the government sought to obtain with the letters. Photograph: Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images
Matt Williams and agencies
A US judge has ordered Google to comply with FBI secret demands for customer data, despite earlier ruling the warrantless orders unconstitutional.
District court judge Susan Illston this week rejected the internet search giant's argument that so-called National Security Letters (NSLs) violated its constitutional rights. As such it ordered Google to hand over private information relating to US citizens to federal agents.
It comes despite Illston earlier ruling the letters unconstitutional in a separate case in March. In that case, brought by non-profit advocacy group the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the judge said that such demands violated the right to free speech.
She also ruled against gagging clauses attached to the demands that prevent the recipients of NSLs from disclosing the mere existence of an order.
"The court concludes that the nondisclosure provision violates the First Amendment … the government is therefore enjoined from issuing NSLs … or from enforcing the nondisclosure provision in this or any other case," Illston concluded in March.
The ruling followed a legal challenge brought by California telecommunications company Credo, the Guardian understands. A 90-day delay in the order coming into effect was put in place by the judge in anticipation of an appeal by the government.
But hopes from civil liberty groups that the ruling would blow a hole in the FBI's use of the secret demands for data have seemingly been dashed by this week's development
The ruling in the Google case was first disclosed by the Associated Press on Friday.
Illston's order omits any mention of Google. But the judge said "the petitioner" was involved in a similar case filed on April 22 in New York federal court.
Public records show that on that day, the federal government filed a "petition to enforce National Security Letter" against Google after the company declined to cooperate with government demands.
It was unclear from the judge's ruling what type of information the government sought to obtain with the letters. It was also unclear whom the government was targeting.
The judge put the Google ruling on hold until the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals can decide the matter. Until then, she said, the company would have to comply with the letters unless it shows the FBI didn't follow proper procedures in making its demands for customer data in the 19 letters Google is challenging.
After receiving sworn statements from two top-ranking FBI officials, the judge said she was satisfied that 17 of the 19 letters were issued properly. She wanted more information on two other letters.
Google could appeal the decision. The company declined comment.
Kurt Opsah, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said: "We are disappointed that the same judge who declared these letters unconstitutional is now requiring compliance with them."
The letters, along with the recent seizure of reporters' phone records by the Obama administration, have prompted complaints of government overreach in regards to privacy violations in the name of national security.
Last year the FBI sent out more than 16,000 NSLs to companies relating to the private data – mainly financial, internet or phone records – of more than 7,000 Americans.
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
More on this story
 Yesterday, 11:35am
Google and competition: as users we can give our own verdict
Tom Watson: Google has offered to act more fairly in response to a European commission investigation. But do its concessions go far enough?
 Saturday 1 Jun 2013
Google Adword: beware copycat websites in paid-for search results
Web search results reveal scores of 'rogue websites' tricking the unwary into paying too much for government services
 Friday 31 May 2013
Google donates just 90 seconds' profit to charity policing child abuse
Internet giant pledged only £20,000 to Internet Watch Foundation last year, despite multibillion-dollar turnover
 Friday 31 May 2013
Google must take more action to police explicit content, says Vince Cable
Business secretary admits policing the internet is very difficult, as Keith Vaz calls for code of conduct to be set up for ISPs. By Josh Halliday, Alexandra Topping and Steven Morris
 26 May 2013
Google's Eric Schmidt: change British law and we'd pay more tax
Executive chairman defends company's 'fiduciary responsibility' in face of criticism and says 'what we are doing is legal'
Most read
Technology
The Guardian
1 Google 'bans' facial recognition on Google Glass - but developers persist
2 Press Start: Prey 2 back on? GTA V map assembled? And more
3 Chatterbox: Monday
4 Gunpoint – review
5 Apple's Tim Cook leaves the D11 audience begging for … anything
6 Aaron Swartz: hacker, genius… martyr?
7 Boot up: iPads are PCs (Microsoft says), patent trolls unmasked, Denmark's snoopers, and more
8 Google ordered to hand private customer data over to FBI investigators
9 How one Irish woman made $22bn for Apple in a year
10 20 best Android apps this week
Back to top
Home
UK news
World news
Comment is free
Sport
Football
Life & style
Culture
Business
Travel
Technology
Environment
All sections
Soulmates
Jobs
US edition
Australia edition
Desktop version
About this site
Help
Contact us
Feedback
Terms & conditions
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
© Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies.
All rights reserved.