Silk Road forums

Discussion => Philosophy, Economics and Justice => Topic started by: joywind on May 31, 2013, 09:02 pm

Title: Shit-liberals
Post by: joywind on May 31, 2013, 09:02 pm
I've decided shit-liberals are all somewhat like hack boxing analyst Max Kellerman. Kellerman is this goofy Jew-boy who never played sports, never wrote anything, never did anything of note but he just gets gigs as a color commentator for no reason. So Kellerman is always pretending to be some ''tough'' guy from the streets or some kind of guru, to compensate for the fact that he's just a rich-kid Jewish nerd of mediocre intelligence

Shit-liberals are just goofy creeps whose parents sent them to college for no reason. They aren't very smart and they are not attractive or charasmatic. They have no religion or culture or anything. So they just pretend to be ''outraged'' (by "racism", "sexism", "homophobia", etc) in order to compensate for a lack of personality or any interesting trait.
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: Tellemetree on May 31, 2013, 09:06 pm
I like boxing.
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: Limetless on May 31, 2013, 09:07 pm
Lol, I like this thread. :)
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: s1llyn355 on June 01, 2013, 11:05 am
hi Joywind,

You've used this specific phrase 'shit-liberals' and not simply 'liberals'.
So what proportion of liberals are 'shit-liberals' ? ... approximately.
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: Hungry ghost on June 01, 2013, 03:23 pm
I'm pretty sure the shit liberals have formed a coalition with the shit Torys in my country. It makes a change from shit labour.

I'VE decided that shite libertarians are the kind who don't like things to be too complicated, so they have adopted the extreme end of one ideological axis. That way if anyone ever asks them a question about a political or economic problem, they don't need to think. They can just say "well I think we should let the free market decide."
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: Hungry ghost on June 01, 2013, 03:25 pm
hi Joywind,

You've used this specific phrase 'shit-liberals' and not simply 'liberals'.
So what proportion of liberals are 'shit-liberals' ? ... approximately.

All the Jewish ones. Obviously.
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: Sooperknot on June 01, 2013, 04:03 pm
I'VE decided that shite libertarians are the kind who don't like things to be too complicated, so they have adopted the extreme end of one ideological axis. That way if anyone ever asks them a question about a political or economic problem, they don't need to think. They can just say "well I think we should let the free market decide."

Actually, the free market is complicated as fuck all.  We hand over problems of price optimization to it precisely because they require massive inputs of broadly distributed information regarding supply and demand, individual preferences and expectations.... so much motherfucking information, scattered all over the sodding globe, that no living cocksucker can possibly grasp it all and use it to make wise decisions.

Not even a towering colossus of intellect like Paul Krugman or Ben Bernanke.  /sarcasm
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: Tellemetree on June 03, 2013, 04:19 am
I like boxing.

I like shit liberal boxing even more.

I like making sense.

I like making sense in an obscure black market forum even more.
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: thereefers245 on June 03, 2013, 04:48 am
You know, every day that passes by Hitler starts looking less and less like a bad guy
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: Hungry ghost on June 03, 2013, 11:44 am
You know, every day that passes by Hitler starts looking less and less like a bad guy

Er no, he still looks pretty bad.
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: ProudCannabian on June 03, 2013, 12:02 pm
You know, every day that passes by Hitler starts looking less and less like a bad guy

Er no, he still looks pretty bad.

Really though, who better to represent the right than the guy who went there, all the way?
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: Sooperknot on June 03, 2013, 02:19 pm
Really though, who better to represent the right than the guy who went there, all the way?

In fact, National Socialism incorporated the worst ideas from both far right and far left ideologies.  From the right they got racism and big-business cronyism; from the left they got centralized State control of the means of production, and detailed surveillance and control of the peoples' daily lives.

Hey wait a minute, that sounds like the modern day US.....
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: hatchetman666 on June 03, 2013, 08:48 pm
what would George Washington do? ::)
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: joywind on June 03, 2013, 10:07 pm
A lot of genetic ''whites'' are neutered, anemic, shit-liberals who are into things like faux-gourmet food and obsessing over ass-sex. They're not white.
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: Hungry ghost on June 04, 2013, 01:52 pm
A lot of genetic ''whites'' are neutered, anemic, shit-liberals who are into things like faux-gourmet food and obsessing over ass-sex. They're not white.

Reading your comments makes me feel like I'm standing in front of a faeces flinging monkeys cage.
        I shouldn't be surprised when the stinking ordure comes flying through the bars,  and yet still I feel a twinge of disappointment.
Title: Re: Shit-liberals
Post by: FreedomOutlaw on June 06, 2013, 12:36 am
I have no problem with liberals or "lefties". I used to be a liberal. The liberals I have known are very much like libertarians in the sense that they just want to be left the fuck alone, like the people who formed the communes, some of which are still around today. I guess the proper term for those people are anarcho-primitivists. I even respect the anarcho-communists and anarcho-socialists, not to be confused with asshole Marxists. Some of the best discussion/debates I have ever been in were with knowledgeable ancomms/ansocs, unlike those bratty little Marxists who are angry that someone, somewhere has more "stuff" than they do.

The problem I have is what many of these old liberals have become....PROGRESSIVES. They have actually morphed into the same type of  Autoritarian douchebags that they protested against in the 60s. They are statists (in the very worst sense of the word), planners, social engineers who think that they know what is best for everybody else, and that no one could ever possibly take care of themselves without the their "wisdom" or knowledge, so it must be forced onto people with the threat of and use of deadly violence. The are self-important, arrogant. intellectually constipated assholes that want to control everything in "society" from the type of food people eat, to how much someone can sell a loaf of bread for. Well, what would you expect from an "ideology" that has roots in: Eugenics, Imperialism, central banking, and world war.

So, I suppose when the the OP says "shit liberal" what he really means is "progressive".


(Hmmm, I haven't ranted like that in a while.  :D)