Silk Road forums

Discussion => Newbie discussion => Topic started by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:27 am

Title: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:27 am
I don't believe vendors should have to post 50 posts to get access to the rest of the forum
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:29 am
I MEAN I paid the equivalent of nearly £400 to activate my vendors account guys...
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:30 am
ALSO the verification thing at the bottom of the message box sucks
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:31 am
IT SHOULD BE CHANGED the lines make the letters look different sometimes
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:32 am
LIKE BEFORE I was tying in E because it looked like an E
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:33 am
TURNED OUT it was only an F but the line going through it at the bottom obviously made it look like an E
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:35 am
AND whats with the redirection back to the forum after posting? I want to stay on this thread...
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:36 am
LIKE I POST A REPLY on this thread, and it redirects me back to the "newbies" forum rather than staying on this thread
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:37 am
THE QUICK REPLY IS NOT QUICK ENOUGH I TELL THEE
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:38 am
FYBGBA IS THE VERIFICATION FOR THIS MESSAGE
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:38 am
this thread is starting to feel like twitter
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:40 am
YOU KNOW? like one big conversation with yourself
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: Alexandrus on April 09, 2013, 07:41 am
It is very unfortunate that vendors also have to get 50 posts to post outside newbie discussion.
Vendors have enough work to do as it is.
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:42 am
so I just got this message:

"An Error Has Occurred!
The last posting from your IP was less than 0 seconds ago. Please try again later."
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:43 am
It is very unfortunate that vendors also have to get 50 posts to post outside newbie discussion.
Vendors have enough work to do as it is.

yeah totally agreed, hello btw!

those weed cookies look rather tastey  ;D
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:45 am
has anyone else noticed that the verification thing to log in to SR always has some type of drug related word in it like hash or chron LOL I found that hilarious
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:46 am
I WOULD LOVE  a weed cookie right about now, NGL
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:48 am
SO THIS IS proper dragging on, I'de rather pay to be allowed instant access to the full forum
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:49 am
TIME is worth much more then money guys
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:49 am
I feel like I am being robbed of it
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: Alexandrus on April 09, 2013, 07:50 am
SO THIS IS proper dragging on, I'de rather pay to be allowed instant access to the full forum
True, I wouldn't mind paying for access either.
Will take very long to get the 50 posts. :(
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:51 am
So I'm selling ketamine
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:52 am
pure injectable human grade vials, only stock in the UK right now
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:53 am
I need to get the ball rolling, my prices are slashed at the moment
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:55 am
LOWEST PRICED UK PHARMACEUTICALS. cheaper then buying from abroad
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:55 am
Right fuck this
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 07:56 am
I NEED SOME BREAKFAST if I am to sit here all day trying to get to 50 posts
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 09, 2013, 08:35 am
SO STUFFED eggs and bacon
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: uhrwerk on April 09, 2013, 11:47 am
I second your opinion. nobody benefits from this rule.
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: natsfloor on April 09, 2013, 11:56 am
YOOO
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: msr201 on April 09, 2013, 11:59 am
your nearly there! i still got ages and now my bum is hurting. anyone wanting to do 50 posts in a few hours get a comfy chair and a spliff. spelling mistakes are allowed
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: natsfloor on April 09, 2013, 12:03 pm
GET ME DOE
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: natsfloor on April 09, 2013, 12:15 pm
TZU
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: natsfloor on April 09, 2013, 12:24 pm
dam right
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: msr201 on April 09, 2013, 12:26 pm
38th post signed by - msr201
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: natsfloor on April 09, 2013, 12:33 pm
^meh
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: natsfloor on April 09, 2013, 12:35 pm
not even funny
Title: Re: VENDORS shouldn't have to get to 50 posts
Post by: fatsam on April 12, 2013, 09:36 am
HOW dare you attempt to hijack my thread with your spam, are you trying to get your post count up or something??!