𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwern20h(At least when commercial publishers offer "manuscript editing" services, presumably as pay-for-play for non-ESL/Third World paper churners & mills, it mostly just seems like it pads garbage journals no one has to read. Putting ad paywalls on notable published papers, though...)
1,836
21
1.1%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwern20hDid you think it was not possible for commercial academic publisher websites to get worse?
My friends, I bear grim tidings: Oxford University Press has discovered that when academic IPs want to download PDFs, they can serve popup ads: pic.twitter.com/GykBzhRDBO
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernJun 5But 4 or 5 no longer add any important mechanics. At 3, you have efficient short matches like 'best of 3'. At 4, the outcomes start overlapping and becoming redundant, without speeding up matches. (Maybe related to base-3/e?)
1,865
36
1.9%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernJun 5I think it's because 2 forces better/worse, so can require a lot of games to ever approximate equality, but 3 allows better/worse/same outcomes and ties are an important mechanic for games. Otherwise, every encounter requires you to either be perfect, or suffer constant attrition
1,916
39
2.0%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernJun 5You obviously can't go lower than 2 choices like matching-pennies (1 choice is no choice), but why not 2? Or 4, like rock-paper-scissors-lizard? Or 5?
They have surprisingly complicated Nash, too, so they're not boring or trivial: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_pape… . Why way less popular?
601
71
11.8%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernJun 5Trying to help my sister at a fighting game in a dream, I explained to her, "like all of them, it's just rock-paper-scissors—high attacks, low attacks, and blocks. RPS is everywhere."
"But why is it everywhere‽" she asked.
Uh... good question. After all, matching-pennies works
6,394
336
5.3%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernJun 4Finally got `gpt-4-base` access and playing around with it feels like coming home—yes, the poetry is way better! (As expected, something must have gone badly wrong with the finetuning.)
Reminded me almost immediately of Moravec: jetpress.org/volume1/morave…pic.twitter.com/OJxGWYV9YT
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernJun 1(This was revealed to me in a dream about Twitter, and therefore must be true.)
4,694
38
0.8%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernJun 1Startup culture trains people to do instead of think; this is why podcast interviews are so often the first, last, and best documentation about how a company really was.
2,612
90
3.4%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernMay 31He was banned in 2012, but it's unclear how many falsehoods were left, whether he was using any other socks or anon IPs, why, what he has spent the past 12 years doing, or how far his claims have been carried by citogenesis or fellow Islamic ideologues (aeon.co/essays/why-fak…).
6,661
719
10.8%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernMay 31If you ever feel confident about what you 'know' about the Islamic medieval period bc you "just love reading Wikipedia", you may want to know that in 2010, a crazy person spent 2 years falsifying hundreds of claims of Islamic invention, everything from p-n junctions to… twitter.com/Noahpinion/sta…
31,477
3,057
9.7%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernMay 31And today I wake up to the pleasant news that they fixed it! It's still bad, but at least now it's not the single worst & most broken website for copy-pasting basic metadata...
What a pity they don't make billions of dollars annually & so can't afford decent publishing tech. 😢
2,795
42
1.5%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernMay 31Then they asked for video of it not working in Chrome, after I had repeatedly said it worked in Chrome, for a bug report whose title was "authors cannot be copy-pasted in Firefox"!
After I explained this request was nonsense on stilts and utterly irrelevant, they went quiet. pic.twitter.com/O4LTyNxCbM
2,518
61
2.4%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernMay 31They then sent me a customer satisfaction survey, asking if I was satisfied.
I was not.
I also checked the "may contact me for further information" option.
They did. Their suggestion was that they had tested Chrome & it worked (as I already said); use Chrome. Uh... no. pic.twitter.com/9iJVG5lklt
903
72
8.0%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernMay 31I eventually got tired of this & contacted them back in January explaining the problem, including screenshots & Firefox version (up to date, a week old).
I got a reply suggesting that I upgrade my Firefox. 🤦♂️
5 months later, I got an email saying they were unable to fix it.
956
32
3.3%
View post activity
𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫@gwernMay 31One off-site improvement: Firefox users can now copy-paste author lists on Elsevier websites (specifically Sciencedirect.com).
Yes, that didn't work before, for several years. You couldn't select the authors on the HTML, you had to go to the PDF or find another source!
927
31
3.3%
View post activity
Engagements
Showing 28 days with daily frequency
Engagement rate
5.3%
Jun 8
3.0% engagement rate
Link clicks
4.6K
Jun 8
60 link clicks
On average, you earned 163 link clicks per day
Retweets without comments
1
Jun 8
0 Retweets without comments
On average, you earned 0 Retweets without comments per day